Who the hell doen't love a good old unifying principle? I simply adore one.
I ran across this one a while back while doing some search on some potentially toxic substance or another and found that it really brings into focus why I'm cautious and gives me a true blue theory to hang my reluctance to use certain products on. Sweet!
The Precautionary Principle states (and I am paraphrasing) that if an action or policy might cause harm
to the public, we should act to avoid the potential harm even in the absence of scientific certainty as to the likelihood, magnitude, or cause of the harm. It's basically a response to uncertainty and is most commonly applied in the environmental and biological sciences.
So let's use Bisphenol-A for example since it's been in the news a lot lately. This substance is in everything--baby bottles, Nalgene water bottles, the lining of canned foods, dental sealants. The FDA says this substance is safe. They say it's safe because there are no studies that conclusively link it to disease. However, besides all the plastics that contain Bisphenol-A, it can also be found in...YOU AND ME! That's right, it's in your breast milk and any tumors you might be currently growing. Freaky-deaky.
So by applying the Precautionary Principle, the Canadians are moving to label this substance as toxic and ban it's use in products because its safety is uncertainn. This is how it works in many countries. Canada, and Europe most definitely. They are way out in front of us on issues involving potentially dangerous chemicals and GMO foods.
The US of A looks at things a bit differently and has gone ahead and labeled Bisphenol-A as safe because its toxicity is uncertain. Considering some of the other things the FDA has approved and then pulled off the market because of the true public health threats (DDT, Thalidomide, Phenphen) I like Plan A better.
The Precautionary Principle also means that the burden of proof is on the those who advocate FOR use of a substance, not the other way around. You have to conclusively prove that it's safe, not dangerous. Again, here we do it the other way around. Me no likey.
So, call me Continental, but I try to apply the Precautionary Principle when it comes to substances my family and I ingest. Frankly, it makes things easier. I don't have to research every single threat. If a study pops up that says there's some evidence for concern, I just go with it. I must admit, when I was younger, I didn't think this way. I was a little more damn the torpedoes. And maybe that's our collective problem--we're a young, we'll live forever kind of country. Feels like the tide is kind of turning though, doesn't it? Like maybe we're growing up?
Perhaps more people will start applying the Precautionary Principle and it will trickle up. Things happen that way in this country. The people often drive policy that way. Things just have to reach critical mass before the bureaucrats pulls their heads out of their asses and notice.
Discuss.